LLM Evaluation Report

ModelDateTotal Response Time (s)Tests PassedMean CodeBLEU (0-1)Mean Usefulness Score (0-4)Mean Functional Correctness Score (0-4)

o1-preview

2024-11-21

2208.03

132

0.321908

3.60976

3.64024

o1-mini

2024-11-21

718.012

134

0.322883

3.65244

3.7561

gpt-4o

2024-11-21

321.525

125

0.316051

3.70732

3.7439

gpt-4o-mini

2024-11-21

191.192

114

0.339313

3.62805

3.69512

claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620

2024-11-21

335.662

113

0.303122

3.60366

3.62195

claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022

2024-11-21

351.938

110

0.321726

3.67073

3.67683

gemini-1.5-pro

2024-11-21

528.459

106

0.340196

3.43293

3.5061

gemini-1.5-flash

2024-11-21

759.693

2

0.270065

0.670732

0.829268

Total Response Time (s): The total time taken by the model to generate all the outputs.

Tests passed: The number of unit tests that the model has passed during evaluation, out of a total of 164 tests.

Mean CodeBLEU: Average CodeBLEU score, a metric for evaluating code generation quality based on both syntactic and semantic correctness.

Mean Usefulness Score: Average rating of the model's output usefulness as rated by a LLM model.

  • 0: Snippet is not at all helpful, it is irrelevant to the problem.

  • 1: Snippet is slightly helpful, it contains information relevant to the problem, but it is easier to write the solution from scratch.

  • 2: Snippet is somewhat helpful, it requires significant changes (compared to the size of the snippet), but is still useful.

  • 3: Snippet is helpful, but needs to be slightly changed to solve the problem.

  • 4: Snippet is very helpful, it solves the problem.

Mean Functional Correctness Score: Average score of the functional correctness of the model's outputs, assessing how well the outputs meet the functional requirements, rated by a LLM model.

  • 0 (failing all possible tests): The code snippet is totally incorrect and meaningless.

  • 4 (passing all possible tests): The code snippet is totally correct and can handle all cases.

Last updated